Question about LK35
- Trådstartare sundance
- Start datum
If it is the ones I think you refer to, they were used to attach a military radio station (model number 145/146) between frame and actual sack. I can not think of any good civilian use for these.
I would also look for a better backpack in general, no waist belt makes it uncomfortable to carry heavy load. But rugged and perhaps can be found very cheap.
/Patrik
Lästips
ANNONS
Stabil sikt för skarpa naturupplevelser – Nikons nya kikare lyfter blicken
STABILIZED S ger stadig bild i varje ögonblick. Skarp optik, låg vikt och lång batteritid gör dig redo att se mer.
Yes, that's probably it. For clarity, I've attached another photo.
In terms of comfort, without a hip belt, it's only designed for light loads. But it only has a capacity of 35 liters, which is very small for military use. For me, however, 35-40 liters is often enough.
I bought it at a flea market a few years ago. Since I enjoy tinkering and sewing, I will continue to use the frame and give it a new bag. In the process, it will also get new straps and a hip belt. With that, it will probably weigh almost as much as my normal base weight ;-)
In terms of comfort, without a hip belt, it's only designed for light loads. But it only has a capacity of 35 liters, which is very small for military use. For me, however, 35-40 liters is often enough.
I bought it at a flea market a few years ago. Since I enjoy tinkering and sewing, I will continue to use the frame and give it a new bag. In the process, it will also get new straps and a hip belt. With that, it will probably weigh almost as much as my normal base weight ;-)
Bilagor
For old Swedish military stuff, ruggedness takes precedence over leightweight.
If you load it heavy, I guess you break you back before the frame is broken
/Patrik
